THE BENEFITS AND PROTECTION OF CHILDREN IN DETERMINATION OF GUARDIANSHIP (A CASE STUDY OF DETERMINATION OF THE SHARIA COURT OF BANDA ACEH NUMBER 2/PDT.P/2021/MS.BNA)

Authors

  • Ghifar Afghany Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Ilyas Ilyas Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Teuku Muttaqin Mansur Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v22i2.673

Keywords:

guardianship, child protection, benefit

Abstract

Determination of The Sharia Court Of Banda Aceh Number 2/Pdt.P/2021/MS.Bna, which determines the biological mother as the guardian of her biological child, causes a legal conflict. On the one hand, based on the provisions of Article 47 of the Marriage Law, the biological mother, as the parent, represents the child in carrying out legal actions. On the other hand, based on this determination, the biological mother as guardian represents the child in legal actions. This research explains the method of legal discovery and legal considerations in determining guardianship. This research is normative legal research. Secondary data sources come from books, texts, journals, magazines, newspapers, documents, laws and regulations, etc. Research findings show that in the Determination Of The Sharia Court Of Banda Aceh Number 2/Pdt.P/2021/MS.Bna, the judge has carried out a legal construction of analogous arguments, namely Article 47 of the Marriage Law, which cannot resolve the case. However, the events faced in substance it is similar to other regulations related to guardianship, so when Article 47 of the Marriage Law cannot resolve the problem, this provision can be waived. An applicant who is able and has good faith in taking care of himself and the assets of the child who will be under his guardianship in the best possible way and solely for the benefit or benefit of the child, in the perspective of child protection theory, is entitled to be granted guardianship rights. In the Determination Of The Sharia Court Of Banda Aceh Number 2/Pdt.P/2021/MS.Bna there is benefit and harm, what becomes madarat is that if the petition is rejected, the child is abandoned because there is no one to take care of themselves and their property, while what becomes maslahah is if the petition is granted by appointing the Petitioner as the guardian of their children, then the objectives of the Shari’a can be fulfilled, namely take care of the soul of the child and protect the property of the child.

References

Alfarobi, Z. S., & Prasetyo, M. H. (2019). Penetapan Perwalian Anak Terkait Pertanggung Jawaban Orang Tua Menjual Harta Anak Di Bawah Umur Karena Pewarisan. Notarius, 12(1), 296–312.

Arto, A. M. (2015). Pembaruan Hukum Islam melalui Putusan Hakim. Pustaka Pelajar.

Busyro, M., Saifuddin, B., & Nasution, S. A. (2021). Analisa Hukum tentang Penetapan Perwalian Anak di Bawah Umur Berdasarkan Penetapan Pengadilan di Wilayah Hukum Pengadilan Negeri Padangsidimpuan. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora, 8(2), 372–379.

Cahyani, F. P., & Kadir, M. Y. A. (2023). Guardianship Supervisory in Indonesia: A Comparative Analyzes of Baitul Mal Aceh and the Heirloom Board. Al-Ahkam, 33(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.2.17080

Determination of the Maros Religious Court Number 58/Pdt.P/2016/PA.Mrs.

Dewi, E. C. (2020). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Perwalian Anak Yatim Piatu yang Masih di Bawah Umur. Perpektif Hukum, 20(2), 161–179.

Government Regulation Number 29 of 2019 concerning Requirements and Procedures for Appointing Guardians.

Harahap, M. Y. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan. Sinar Grafika.

Hartati, R., Syafrida, & Suryani, R. (2021). Perwalian Anak Akibat Meninggal Kedua Orang Tuanya (Studi Kasus Gala Sky Anak Pasangan Artis Vanessa Angel dan Febri Ardiansyah). Pamulang Law Review, 4(2), 205–220.

HS, S., & Nurbani, E. S. (2013). Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi. Rajawali Press.

Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.

Law Number 11 of 2006 concerning Aceh Government.

Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Amendments to Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage.

Law Number 17 of 2016 concerning Stipulation of Government Regulations in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection into Law.

Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection.

Soemitro, R. H. (1988). Metode Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Ghalia Indonesia.

Sunggono, B. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Rajawali Pers.

Syamsudin, M. (2007). Operasionalisasi Penelitian Hukum. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Wahyudi, F. (2019). Penerapan Prinsip Prudential dalam Perkara Perwalian Anak. Mimbar Hukum, 31(3), 368–383.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-27