COMPENSATION LIABILITY FOR CONSUMERS OF BEAUTY PRODUCTS THAT DISTRIBUTION LICENSES HAVE BEEN WITHDRAWN BY BPOM PERSPECTIVE COMPILATION OF SHARIA ECONOMIC LAW

Authors

  • Siti Nazar UNIVERSITAS ISLAM NEGERI SUMATERA UTARA
  • Mhd. Yadi Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20414/ijhi.v22i1.588

Keywords:

cosmetics, marketing authorization, compensation liability

Abstract

Cosmetics are defined as particular components designed to be applied to the surface of the human body. Cosmetics are beauty products women use to beautify or change their appearance. It is usually used to beautify the outside of the human body to get an attractive appearance. Even though they are not a basic need, cosmetics are one of the many products used daily and routinely, especially by women. This study aims to find out the form of accountability for compensation related to beauty products whose distribution permits have been withdrawn but whose products are still found circulating in the community and how that will be done according to the views of the Sharia Economic Law Compilation (KHES) and Law No. 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. This study uses a juridical-normative research method in which legal and statutory theory is the approach. The theory used in this study is the theory of legal protection, namely providing protection for human rights that are harmed by other people. The results of this study explain that legal protection and liability for compensation to consumers, especially for beauty products whose distribution permits have been withdrawn by BPOM, are regulated in KHES and in UUPK Article 4 letter a, which explains the rights of consumers to obtain safety, security and comfort when using goods/services. And business actors are responsible if consumers suffer losses in the future for refunds and provide compensation according to the provisions of Article 19 paragraph (2) for consumers who are harmed to receive compensation for their health.

References

Amri, F. Z. (2020). Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penjualan Kosmetik Illegal Online Oleh Balai Besa Pengawas Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) Pekanbaru. JOM Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau, 1-15.

Arrahman, Y. R., & Mustarichie, R. (2018). Wewenang dan Alur Pemeriksaan Oleh Balai Besar Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Bandung terhadap Kasus temuan Parasit Cacing pada Produk Makerel. Jurnal Farmaka, 21-26.

Az-Zuhaili, W. (1998). Nazariyah al-Dhaman. Dimasyq: Dar Al-Fikr.
Dera, R. A. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Terjhadap Prederaan Produk Kosmetik Berbahaya. Jurnal Lex Privatium, VII, 14-22.

Dominika, N., & Hasyim. (2019). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Konsumen Atas Penjualan Kosmetik Berbahaya di Indonesia. Jurnal Niagawan, 1-11.

Kahuripan, A. (2018). Badan POM Kuat Menuju Indonesia Hebat. Majalah Farmasetika, 69-72.

Launde, A. P., Pioh, N. R., & Waworundeng, W. (2020). Tugas dan Fungsi Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Dalam Melindungi Kesehatan Masyarakat Kota Manado. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 4, 17.

Mantili, R. (2019). GAnti Kerugian Immateril Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Dalam Praktik : Perbandingan Indonesia dan BElanda. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum De'Jure, 298-321.

Muliyawan, D., & Suriana, N. (2013). A-Z Tentang Kosmetik. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Prabowo, D. E., & Kurniawan, D. (2021). Peraturan Pengawasan Badan Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan (BPOM) Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen . Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Universitas Balikpapa, 1-25.

Praditama, B., & Ramadhani, D. A. (2021). Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Atas Kerugian Konsumen dalam Perjanjian Baku. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 1544-1552.

Rahayu , R. S., Suprihatin, I. E., & Rita, W. S. (2017). Identifikasi Pewarna Merah K3 (Cl 15585) Dalam Produk kosmetik Sediaan perona Mata LC-MS/MS . Indonesian e-jurnal of Applied Chemistry, 34-42.

Ramailis, N. W., & Wandi, P. D. (2018). Peran BPOM Kota Pekanbaru Dalam Mengawasi Perdagangan Kosmetik Ilegal. Jurnal Kriminologi, 3, 39.

Setiawan, D. (2020). Tugas dan Wewenang Balai Besar Pengawasan Obat dan Makanan Dalam Mengawasi Makanan Yang Mengandung Zat Berbahaya. Jurnal Elkektronik Hukum Bisnis, 420 - 435.

Sinaga, N. A., & Sulisduratin, N. (2015). Pelaksanaan Perlindungan Konsumen di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 5, 71-87.

Soekanto, S., & Mamudji, S. (2014). Penelitian Hukum Normatif : . Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Ukkasah, S. A., Ardi, M., & Putra, J. K. (2019, September). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Kosmetik yang Tidak Memiliki Izin Edar. Jurnal Lex Suprema, I, 1-16.

Ulum, F. (2016). Kontruksi Hukum Ekonomi Islam Kontemporer: Analisis Teori Sistem Jasser Auda TErhadap Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jurnal Isinbath, 1-22.

Winata, M. G. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Pengguna produk KOsmetik Ilegal Berbahaya. Jurnal Sapientia et Virtus , 34-43.

Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, PMA No. 02 Tahun 2008
Undang-undang No.08 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen

Downloads

Published

2023-05-16

Issue

Section

Articles