PERADILAN AGAMA DAN SENGKETA EKONOMI SYARI’AH (Studi Atas Efektifitas UU No 3 Tahun 2006 di Kota Metro)
Keywords:
Absolute Competence of Religiuos Courts, Economic Syariah Disputes, Act No.3 2006Abstract
Since the born of Enactment of law No. 3 2006 and Act No. 50 2009 is a new era of religious couts. These acts was a change of Act No. 7 1989 of Religious Courts. The main changes of this law is the existence of absolute territorial expansion of the religious courts to handle economic Syariah dispute. This paper answered how the readiness of religious court Class IB Kota Metro dealing with islamic finance dispute and identified supporting factors and inhibiting factors related to the readiness of religious courts of Kota Metro to handle absolute competence in Islamic finance dispute. The findings of this research showed that the result of observation and interview to the judge, clerk of the court, jury and enterpreneur analyzed by Friedman theory. The result showed that the religious court Kota Metro has been ready to handle islamic finance dispute at the legal substance and legal structure level. The problem was on law culture of citizen that tend to avoid the curiousity toward law and court. As a result, some islamic finance disputes that happened in BMT, BPRS and Bank Syariah compromised out of the court. The solution of the problems were chosen because of some considerations such as case complexity, economic factor and maintaining good relationship factor.
References
Kelembagaan Agama Islam, Direktorat Pembinaan Badan Peradilan agama
Islam, 2000
Ahmad Rafiq, Cet.VI, Hukum Islam di Indonesia, Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada,
2003
Muhammad Daud Ali, Hukum Islam dan Peradilan Agama (Kumpulan Tulisan),
Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 1997)
Jaih Mubarak, “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah di Indonesiaâ€, diakses
dari www.badilag.net
Sengketa Ekonomi Syari’ah (Antara Kompetensi Pengadilan Agama dan Badan
Arbitrase Syari’ah)., www. republika.online.
Mustafa Edwin, Pengenalan Eksklusif Ekonomi Islam, Makalah tidah diterbitkan.
www.metrokota.go.id.
Lexy J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda
Karya, 2000.
Khotibul Umam, SH., LL. M, Penyelesaian Sengketa di Luar Pengadilan, Yogyakarta:
Penerbit Pustaka Yustisia, 2010
Imam Al-Mawardi, Al-Ahkam as- Sulthaniyyah, Beirut: Dar al Fikr, ,1960
Said Agil Husein al Munawar, “Pelaksanaan Arbitrase di Dunia Islamâ€, Dalam
Arbitrase Islam di Indonesia, BAMUI & BMI, Jakarta: T.np, 1994.
Suyyud Margono, ADR dan Arbitrase: Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum, Jakarta:
Ghalia Indonesia, 2000.
A. Mukti Arto, Mencari Keadilan, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.
Soleman B. Taneko, Pokok-Pokok Studi Hukum dalam Masyarakat, Jakarta: PT.
RajaGrafindo Persada, 1993
Noeng Muhajir, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, Yogyakarta: Rake Sarasin, 1989.
Amir Syarifudin, SH. dan Harun Al-Rasyid, Himpunan Perundang-undangan dan
Peraturan Pemerintah tentang Badan-Badan Peradilan di Indonesia, Jakarta:
Ghalia Indonesia, 1989.
Tim Penyusun, Sejarah Pengadilan Agama Metro, (Metro:tnp, 2008.
www.badilag.net.
PP No 45 tahun 1957.
UU No 7 Tahun 1989 dan penjelasan tentang Pengadilan Agama.
M. Suyanto, Perbandingan Kinerja Bank Islam terhadap Bank Persero, Bank Asing,
Bank Umum, di Indonesia tahun 2000 – 2004, isa7695.wordpress.com
Statistik Perbankan Syari’ah Bank Indonesia, diakses dari www.bi.go.id tanggal
29 Desember 2010.
A. Mukti Arto, Mencari Keadilan, Yogyakarta, Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.
Achmad Ali, Keterpurukan Hukum di Indonesia (penyebab dan solusinya),
( Jakarta:Ghalia Indonesia, 2002),hlm. 9
Tim Peneliti, Akses terhadap Keadilan: Pemberdayaan Perempuan Kepala Keluarga
di Indonesia, ( Jakarta: PEKKA & Usaid, 2010), hlm.62